You can help by making a $1 fund contribution to POSB savings 279-12328-0
or simply sharing our message with your family and friends.
Thank you.

Focus on fertility not foreign workforce: NSP


National Solidarity Party (NSP) on Friday urged government to cap the growth of Singapore’s foreign workforce and focus instead on improving the fertility rate as a solution to the city-state’s population woes.
Why don’t they just create an environment where people will reproduce?
It’s natural for humans to want to reproduce to ensure continuity of their own kind isn’t it?
Look at the number of cases where guys can’t have sex with their wives probably they aren’t allowed to cum inside but out looking for others?


Releasing its own population white paper, the opposition party criticised the government’s broad plan to allow Singapore’s current population of 5.3 million to rise to 6.9 million, of which nearly half would be foreigners, to ensure the country’s sustainable economic development.
Having economic development doesn’t mean the population will develop but if the fertility rate increase doesn’t that give you both improved fertility rate and economic development?

In a presentation of its paper Friday night, NSP Secretary General Hazel Poa batted for a “pause” in the growth of the country’s foreign workforce until productivity growth increases since “we are increasing the number of people faster that we able to increase the value of goods and services produced”.
Do you think Singapore’s providing education or corruption from private universities to local universities to law schools?

“The increase (in population) is to likely to further depress our fertility rate, creating a vicious cycle,” said NSP.
Is it just a vicious cycle?

NSP also pointed out that the growth in foreign labour did not match the growth in productivity thereby showing that it made little sense to continually embrace the foreign workers. Plus, the influx of foreign workers has depressed wages for lower-income Singaporeans, the party said.
Do they mind even after the riots?

Companies have to “offer better wages to attract workers or they have to improve their productivity,” she asserted, adding that infrastructure should also be built first to accommodate a larger number of people before allowing the population expansion.
Do they care as long as they get their money?

Meanwhile, NSP Head of Policy Tony Tan questioned the wisdom of having a denser population in Singapore as studies have shown that the regions with the highest population densities – such as Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore – also have the lowest fertility rates.
Don’t this show if they really care about the future?

The party also took issue with the argument that the declining number of working citizens to the support the elderly called for the entry of more people into the country now.
Maybe they think that the foreigners will keep their money here to feed the elderly in Singapore rather than sending them back to their hometown?

“If at some point of time we are unable to improve our fertility rate, what we could very well do at that stage, we could always bring in more foreign workers to augment us” said Tan, “but what government is saying, we bring in the citizens now.”
Citizens or cheap labour?

Tan said that if Singapore welcomed foreign workers now, it “is going to exacerbate our old age support ratio” in 2030 when these workers themselves become part of the retired old age group.
Isn’t improving fertility rate the better option?

Instead of getting the foreign population to compensate Singapore’s dwindling workforce, promote more policies that would encourage families to have more children that would be part of future manpower, the NSP argued.
Are they willing?

In order to encourage Singaporeans to have bigger families, NSP member Bryan Long suggested tackling the high cost of bringing up more children by such measures as providing free upgrades to a larger HDB flats for those who have more children and removing resale levy for parents to move closer to their working children.
As a filial child, I need a room for my parents and another for my spouse and I, let's respect children nowadays and give them their privacy, for the number of rooms that is vacant, I’ll reproduce to fill it up, one child per room, reasonable?

Also, give families with more children priority for school, such as for Primary one school registration and free tertiary education for the third child onwards.
Shouldn’t they give free books since they always change the syllabus and books can’t be passed down from the eldest to the youngest since that’s the basic?

Noting that the government’s baby bonus scheme has not stopped the slide in Singapore’s total fertility rate, Long suggested incentives like free delivery and hospitalisation for the third and subsequent child.
This is totally valid, exactly what I posted on facebook last year.

NSP also proposed that the quota of foreign workers on S Passes and E Passes be limited to 33 per cent. Currently, there is a quota of 20 per cent imposed on S pass holders- those earning between $2000 to $3000 a month- but no quota for E pass holders, or those who earn at least $3000 a month. Making the quota the same would minimise fraudulent declaration of higher salaries in attempt to evade quotas, the party said.
Does Singaporeans even earn more than that?