You can help by making a $1 fund contribution to POSB savings 279-12328-0
or simply sharing our message with your family and friends.
Thank you.

Nparks evolved from “under investigation” to blatant political persecution.

Dear Ms Han,

We refer to your emails of 27 November and 6 December 2016, on speaking at Speakers’ Corner on 10 December 2016.

You would be aware that the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation had earlier informed you that he would not be granting approvals for your applications to use Speakers’ Corner on account of your actions on 27 September 2014, which affected other park users. In order for the Commissioner to now consider your application, he will need to be assured that there will not be a repeat of such an incident. Therefore, please provide your assurance in writing that you will abide by the terms and conditions (as attached) for the use of Speakers’ Corner, in particular that you will not endanger or cause discomfort or inconvenience to other park users.


Dear nparks,

What “actions” are you referring to?
As your director Chia Seng Jiang has testified in court:
“The website does not er say erm east lawn west lawn lawn one lawn two er the website merely outline where is the speakers’ corner boundary.”
“The public order act and the exemption so you don’t need a police permit.”
“It’s erm within the boundary you don’t need a police permit.”
“YMCA did not say that they cannot carry out their event.”



In addition, nparks manager Sim Bee Lan has also testified in court:
“The applicant will apply through online single quarter form and they will just fill in the information and they will just click submit then they will receive the approval.”
“Speakers’ corner is a share space.”
“it’s a open park and people is free to move around.”
“anybody can move or walk around the park.”



According to Singapore’s District Judge Mr CHAY YUEN FATT who disqualified me from standing for parliamentary election, the judgement against me is as follows:
1. SGD$2,500 fine because “She rallied her Facebook readers”.
2. SGD$600 fine because I “made vitriolic speeches to denounce the government and various government policies”.

It was proven in court that I did not wave flag, I did not beat drum, I did not blow whistle and the list goes on.
I was also not charged for marching at Hong Lim Park speakers’ corner.

According to the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation, I was banned as the case was “under investigation”.
The case is no longer “under investigation”; or has the case involved to blatant political persecution?
To purposely reply on the day before the actual event when the email was sent last month, isn’t this using underhand tactics to stop me from speaking at Hong Lim Park tomorrow on 10th Dec 2016?

Why am I the only Singaporean who is being banned from speaking at Hong Lim Park this Saturday on 10th December 2016?
Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how the government has no transparency as to how Temasek lost $24 billion in a year, DBS has lapses in relation to the 1MDB-related fund and how police interrogation led to death of our youth?
Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how there is no accountability when it comes to deaths caused by Hepatitis C, outbreak of tuberculosis cases, outbreak of Zika cases, SGD$470,000 spent on a bin centre or even SGD$368 million spent on 26 defective MRT trains.

Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how PAP policies affect our lives?
Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how after 7th Jun 2014 event on our pension fund, the CPF Minimum Sum at SGD$148,000 was renamed to CPF Retirement Sum, and increased to the current SGD$161,000?
Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how after 12th Jul 2014 event on our public healthcare, the CPF Medisave Contribution Ceiling at SGD$43,500 was renamed to CPF Basic Healthcare Sum, and increased to the current $49,800.
Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how after 23rd Aug 2014 event on our public housing, additional rules apply to the use of CPF savings for flats with remaining lease of less than 60 years, no CPF can be used if the remaining lease of a flat is less than 30 years and a flat owner is eligible to use his CPF savings for the flat only if his age plus the remaining lease of the flat is at least 80 years.
Is it because it’s not allowed to talk about how after 27th Sep 2014 event on our jobs employment, we now have a 3.2% increase in bus fare, $30 increase in carpark fees, 10% increase in electricity tariffs, increase in lifts and trains breakdown?

In the previous email, I have already mentioned:
I have never and will not be speaking on racial or religion issues since the PAP government has made it illegal to do so via the sedition law.
(Even though Singapore’s first prime minister got off scot free saying
“If, for instance, you put in a Malay officer who's very religious and who has family ties in Malaysia in charge of a machine gun unit, that's a very tricky business. I'm saying these things because they are real, and if I don't think that, and I think even if today the Prime Minister doesn't think carefully about this, we could have a tragedy.” and
“I think we were progressing very nicely until the surge of Islam came, and if you asked me for my observations, the other communities have easier integration – friends, inter-marriages and so on – than Muslims... I would say, today, we can integrate all religions and races, except Islam.”)

Regards,
Han Hui Hui