Alvin & Yuki wedding got cancelled 2months before it happens and Zoe Raymond locked her blog.

It’s the season of giving!

A year ago, I told you about
http://huihui247.blogspot.com/2011/12/ghost-protocol.html

This is my third official year, hence there’ll be 300 beneficiaries.
It will be 60 per organisation :)
It’s great that the number of people have reduced as they have moved on to a better life =)


In the social media of Singapore, there’s this saga:
Apparently, this couple is gonna get married.


And here comes this third party.


Sounds like the pink lipstick that I recently talked about.
Every day, people go on fb and comment, the comments are very interesting…
Now I think I went on to read the comments rather that what the people actually said.

So I saw this comment


That she locked her blog, I went and it’s true.

Well, he’s earning 8k a month which will allow her to lead a tai-tai life according to people who commented as well, which is the kinda life she wants so she can just sit back, relax and not bother.
Now that’s sad, because my entertainment is now gone.

For Yuki, she should be glad as break up is better than divorce.
For Alvin, he can now go out openly with Zoe.
For Zoe, she can now become a tai-tai.

Happy ending!

I don’t understand why Yuki still wants Alvin back if she already knows he got another woman out there?
Why hold on to someone who got someone else?
I don’t understand why Alvin can’t be honest to Yuki and break up but propose to her?
Why doesn’t he just stay single and have the two girls going after him?
I don’t understand why Zoe doesn’t mind being a third party?
Is it true when people say that she enjoys being a third party since young?

Comments

Jim said…
hope Tiffany answered your question.
http://tiffanyyong.com/2012/12/24/yuki-alvin-zoe-raymond-answers-to-the-many-whys/
Monday, 24 December 2012 at 16:34:00 GMT+8

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Different HDB flat types and the varying models.

Image
2 bedroom flat Consists of 1 bedroom, kitchen, living room: 2 ‘I’ (Improved) 45 sqm/484sqft 2 ‘S’ (Standard) 41 sqm/441sqft 3 bedroom flat Consists of 2 bedrooms, kitchen, living room: 3 ‘A’ (Modified) 90sqm/969sqft 3 ‘NG’ (Modified) 83sqm/896sqft 3 ‘A’ 75sqm/807sqft 3 ‘NG’ (New Generation) 69sqm/743sqft (2 toilets, master bedroom with attached bathroom) 3 ‘I’ (Modified) 70sqm/750sqft 3 ‘S’ (Simplified) 65sqm/700sqft 3 ‘I’ (Improved) 60sqm/646sqft (No attached bath, toilet and bath separated, no storeroom) 3 ‘STD’ (Standard) 54sqm/581sqft (No attached bathroom/storeroom. Upgraded units have extra utility room or toilet) 4 bedroom flat Consists of 3 bedrooms, kitchen, living room. 4 ‘A’ 105sqm/1130sqft (2 bathrooms, master bedroom with attached toilet, storeroom) 4 ‘NG’ (New Generation) 92sqm/990sqft 4 ‘S’ (Simplified) 85sqm/914sqft (2 bathrooms, master bedroom with attached toilet, storeroom) 4 ‘I’ (Improved) 83sqm/893sqft (toilet and bath separated, no ...
Read more

Review of Diapers in Singapore (10 brands we’ve bought and tried) Pee-Ka-Poo, Drypers, Huggies, Amico, MamyPoko, Merries, Pampers, Offspring, Bambo Nature, Moony

Image
  Pampers Premium Care Tapes Newborn (0-5kg) $27.90 for 70 pieces Bambo Nature Baby Diaper Size 1 (2-5kg) $16.10 for 28 pieces Offspring Ultra-Thin Newborn Diapers (0-4kg) $12.50 for 22 pieces Fashion Diapers S Size (3-6kg) $19.90 for 48 pieces MamyPoko Air Fit Tape Diaper New Born (0-5kg) $25.95 for 90 pieces Air Fit Tape Diaper S (4-8kg) $25.95 for 84 pieces Moony Tape Diapers Newborn (0-5kg) $26.95 for 90 pieces Tape Diapers S (4-8kg) $26.95 for 84 pieces Amico Tape Diapers NB96 x 2 packs (0-5kg) $45.90 for 192 pieces Tape Diapers S88 x 2 packs (4-8kg) $45.90 for 176 pieces Tape Diapers M68 x 2 packs (6-11kg) $45.90 for 136 pieces Tape Diapers L58 x 2 packs (9-14kg) $45.90 for 116 pieces Huggies Platinum Justborn Diapers (0-3.5kg) $11.40 for 24 pieces Platinum Diapers New Born (0-5kg) $11.40 for 30 pieces Platinum Diapers S (4-8kg) $22.95 for 82 pieces Platinum Diapers M (6-11kg) $22.95 for 64 pieces Platinum Diapers L (9-14kg) $22.95 for 54 pieces Platinum Nature Made Diapers -...
Read more

PAP & LKY supporters FAN REN RAY & Bryannz FAN RUICHENG from Cuffz Holdings are cheaters who scammed money using "GLOBAL BUSINESS CLUB PTE. LTD."

Image
In 2010, I collected evidence to expose private education issues.When I gave the information to both the mainstream and... Posted by Han Hui Hui 韩慧慧 on  Friday, July 17, 2015 They are brothers staying at 345 Bukit Batok Street 34 #06-276 Singapore (650345) Police report was being lodged but no action was being taken. It’s not few tens or hundreds of dollars but thousands of dollars from a single person, imagine how many Singaporeans out there are being scammed by this pair of devious brothers? As usual, I was curious why aren’t the police taking any action and upholding justice to return people their hard earned money, so I did a background search. Anyway, this pair of brothers blocked me on facebook after I confronted them on behalf of my friend =.= FAN RUICHENG S8307560J https://www.facebook.com/bryannzfan FAN REN RAY S8025476H https://www.facebook.com/DatoSriRayFan People are questioning why are the police not doing anything and who can the...
Read more

#YearningForJustice : A mother's musings to her future child

Singaporean Han Hui Hui started blogging in 2007. Within a decade, blogging leads her to vlogging, making YouTube videos, meeting people in public, being part of public gatherings, interrogated by the Singapore police, charged in court by the Attorney-General's Chambers, fined by the authority, imprisoned by the establishment, deported by the Malaysian immigration back to Singapore under the demand of the Singapore government in 2017... To grow from a secondary school student in 2007 under the public eye, to have social media platforms being scrutinised by the people, to the extent of having public funds being used to pay the Attorney-General's Chambers so that they can type transcripts of Hui Hui's videos in order to coerce her via an unwritten law - a jail sentence of 18 years and a fine of SGD$600,000 in 2017 is something no one has, and hopefully no one will have to experience. In 2018, the gratitude to be nominated by the International Federation for Human Ri...
Read more

The Exodus of Singaporean Lawyers and the label from "The Leader of The Protests" to "The Leader of The Unvaccinated" in Singapore

Image
In Singapore, the government Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) is busy persecuting lawyers who speak up, or merely raised questions about the incumbent ruling party. On 23 March 2023, lawyer Charles Yeo Yao Hui, who has a warrant of arrest issued against him after he absconded, intended to go to the UK to seek political asylum. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/fugitive-lawyer-charles-yeo-told-investigator-that-he-does-not-intend-to-return-to-singapore On 21 March 2023, lawyer M. Ravi has been handed the maximum suspension of five years for making “baseless and grave” allegations against the Attorney-General, prosecutors and the Law Society that undermine the integrity of Singapore’s justice system. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/lawyer-m-ravi-suspended-for-5-years-over-baseless-allegations-against-justice-system On 3 March 2023, the police have opened investigations into Mr Lee Hsien Yang and his wife Lee Suet Fern for potential offences of g...
Read more

CHILD ABUSE in Singapore shot up 459% despite signing UNCRC

Image
Singapore Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) revealed that the number of investigations into child abuse cases shot up 459% from 383 in 2012 to 2,141 in 2021 despite signing United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/number-of-child-abuse-cases-investigated-remained-high-in-2022-msf According to the government propaganda, the increase in the number of child abuse cases is because "the Children and Young Persons Act amendment came into effect in July 2020, so those who are 16 and older but under 18 will now be part of the statistics on child abuse" Is the government trying to say that child abuse cases for children below the age of 16 did not increase as most of the abuses are against children between the age of 16 and 18? Or is the government trying to cover up the main cause of abuse which is stress of the abusers due to high cost of living that resulted in the vicious cycle of child abuse...
Read more

My response to the Singapore government Ministry of Home Affairs' statement against me.

MHA: First, Ms Han was not subjected to a strip search as she had claimed. She was searched by a female officer and had remained clothed for the entire duration. Second, her allegation that male officers had walked past while she was being searched is untrue. Ms Han was based in the women's wing of the lock-up, which is not accessible to male officers. A privacy screen is also deployed when a search is in progress. What I posted on my blog: “Even socks were taken away from us and we were made to sit on the cold concrete floor.” “There was supposed to be screen used but they simply put it there for show rather than really using it.” (Note: The MHA statement only said "State Court" - I was "body searched" in both the High Court and the State Court). MHA: Third, the allegation that Malaysian APOs (hired by SPS) had made disparaging comments against Singaporeans is unfounded. In addition, the team overseeing the lock-up consists of Prisons officers suppor...
Read more

Alone in cell.

Image
On 27 Jun 2016, Singapore’s state court Judge CHAY YUEN FATT made judgement against me as follows: 1. SGD$2,500 fine because “She rallied her Facebook readers”. 2. SGD$600 fine because I “made vitriolic speeches to denounce the government and various government policies”. On 22 Feb 2017, Singapore’s high court Justice SEE KEE OON rejected my appeal and I was immediately being sent to face 5 weeks in prison for not paying the fine of $3,100. On 22 Feb 2017 at 10am, I was at Singapore’s High Court for the appeal against the judgement made by Singapore’s state court Judge CHAY YUEN FATT. Together with me were two elderly co-accused Ivan Koh (age 62) and Janet Low (age 57). During the appeal hearing, I asked if it was correct to amend the charge sheet just a day before the trial? Our trial was on 13 Oct 2015, but the charge sheet was amended on 12 Oct 2015. It was not acknowledged by us and was not brought to our attention. We only noticed that after we’ve filed our appeal, ...
Read more

Singapore’s judiciary system | “KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT” shouted DPP Francis NG Yong Kiat. Judge kept silent. Judge did nothing.

Image
“KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT” shouted (to Han Hui Hui) Senior Director, Senior State Counsel DPP Francis NG Yong Kiat. Judge kept silent. Judge did nothing. Singapore’s AGC DPP can shout and intimidate Singaporeans, and behave in such an unbecoming manner in court when they do not have any legal representation. If this can happen in broad daylight in court, what do you think happens during police interrogations behind “closed door”? Singapore police used 8 hours to interrogate me and 6 hours for my co-accused, without any lunch or dinner. Can you imagine what 14-year-old Benjamin Lim went through in his 3-hour “interview” at the police station? Is Singapore a first world country? Han Hui Hui: Who did you ask to shout? Ariffin Iskandar Sha Bin Ali Akbar: Roy. Han Hui Hui: Why did you ask Roy to... Posted by Han Hui Hui 韩慧慧 on  Monday, 11 January 2016 Han Hui Hui: Did any of the elderly steps forward and tell you to stop the protest? Judge: *rejected* Han Hui Hui:......
Read more