Singapore Minister for Law cum Minister for Home Affairs is afraid of the truth: Suppressio Veri Suggestio Falsi

Hi everyone,

This is the first time that Singapore's Parliament has a public hearing in the 21st century.

First, they sent an email on 8 March 2018 at 2pm and demanded for me to reply them (within 4 hours) before 6pm Singapore time, when I was in Spain attending the Internet Freedom Festival, asking me to appear before Singapore Minister for Law cum Minister for Home Affairs and others in Parliament:

I agreed.

Second, they sent an SMS on 26 March 2018 during lunch time telling me at the last minute that my session will be changed from 27 March 2018 to 28 March 2018 instead:

I agreed.

Third, they sent an email on 26 March 2018 at night after 7pm telling me at the last minute that my session on 28 March 2018 will be cancelled which leaves the last day on 29 March 2018 instead:

I agreed.

Below is the email from Singapore’s Parliament that they have dis-invited me.

The real reason why Singapore’s Parliament repeatedly changed the schedule is to make life difficult for me, so that I will not agree and they can publish falsehoods like what they did to International Human Rights Organizations:


Human Rights Watch:

  • http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/us-based-ngo-fails-to-show-up-for-hearing
  • https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pap-policy-forum-slams-human-rights-watch-report-on-singapore-10070042
  • https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/human-rights-watch-drops-out-attending-public-hearing-online-falsehoods


Reporters Without Borders:

  • https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/select-committee-still-open-to-hearing-from-human-rights-watch-10081000
  • https://mothership.sg/2018/03/daniel-bastard-reporters-without-borders-singapore-select-committee


The Singapore government pretends to be democratic when they are nothing but a bunch of hypocrites.

In my submission, I stated that Singapore’s government controlled mainstream media is often the ones spreading “fake news”.

First example:
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/blogger-han-hui-hui-fined-3100-for-role-in-hong-lim-park-rally
According to judge Chay Yuen Fatt, I was fined SGD$2,500 for being the organiser of the #ReturnOurCPF movement as I “rallied her Facebook readers to come to the CPF event” and another SGD$600 as I “made vitriolic speeches to denounce the government and various government policies”.
It was testified in court that “On the Nparks website, there are three options but a Singaporean is only allowed to choose one”
http://huihui247.blogspot.com/2016/01/sim-bee-lan.html
Is it fair for my fellow Singaporeans and I to be found guilty for a glitch in the government website?

Second example:
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/blogger-han-hui-huis-allegations-that-she-was-mistreated-in-state-courts-cell-baseless-and
The Singapore government took issue with my blog post “Alone in cell.” http://huihui247.blogspot.com/2017/02/alone-in-cell.html
However, the Singapore government did not show the 4 CCTVs of me being searched and the 5 CCTVs of me in the cell: http://huihui247.blogspot.com/2017/03/my-response-to-singapore-government.html
I am the only Singaporean whose treatment inside the cell is not being shown whereas other Singaporeans were invited by the police to review their CCTVs: https://www.facebook.com/singaporepoliceforce/posts/10156006868164408

Third example:
http://www.straitstimes.com/politics/blogger-han-hui-hui-removes-posts-that-were-in-contempt-of-court-and-issues-apology
The truth is that the Singapore government, through the Attorney-General's Chambers coerced me with 18 years’ jail and SGD$600,000 fine using a law that had not been gazetted and therefore not in effect yet.
I was made to remove 14 seconds of my YouTube video, edit three of my Facebook postings and posted a total of 18 links on my social media accounts or potentially face 18 years’ jail and SGD$600,000 fine.
Since then, my volunteers and I have stopped posting online but continued doing human rights work for Singaporeans (especially in assisting their housing application or healthcare funding) yet the Singapore government demanded Malaysia’s immigration to deport me for being a "national threat" that would affect "bilateral relationship" between the two countries: https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/han-hui-hui-prevented-entering-malaysia-and-deported and https://www.fidh.org/en/region/asia/malaysia/singaporean-activist-deported-barred-from-workshop

To date, I’m the only Singaporean who has been disqualified in the upcoming general election because of the fine and the only Singaporean who is unable to enter Malaysia.
Singapore Minister for Law cum Minister for Home Affairs is afraid of the truth: Suppressio Veri Suggestio Falsi.
He and the whole parliament are afraid of the truth if I were to speak in Parliament so they purposely changed the schedule numerous times at the very last minute and ultimately dis-inviting me yet pretending that they have time if anyone wants to speak.

This is the pathetic state of human rights and democracy in Singapore where the Singapore Minister for Law cum Minister for Home Affairs dare not face their own doings that I’m the only Singaporean being deported, the only Singaporean coerced with a potential of 18 years jail and SGD$600,000 fine via an unwritten law, the only Singaporean whose CCTV during imprisonment cannot be shown.

Please feel free to share this.
Thank you.

Regards,
Han Hui Hui

From: PARL Selectcommittee (PARL)
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:34 PM To: Han Hui Hui 韩慧慧 Subject: RE: Invitation to Give Oral Evidence – S/N 15 (To be confirmed)

Dear Ms Han
 Thank you for agreeing to accept the invitation to give evidence to the Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods.
 Due to scheduling difficulties, the Select Committee will not proceed to take oral evidence from you. However, please be assured that the Select Committee will consider your written representations.
 Sorry for any inconveniences caused.
 Best regards
 Lin Hwee

Popular posts from this blog

Different HDB flat types and the varying models.

Image
2 bedroom flat Consists of 1 bedroom, kitchen, living room: 2 ‘I’ (Improved) 45 sqm/484sqft 2 ‘S’ (Standard) 41 sqm/441sqft 3 bedroom flat Consists of 2 bedrooms, kitchen, living room: 3 ‘A’ (Modified) 90sqm/969sqft 3 ‘NG’ (Modified) 83sqm/896sqft 3 ‘A’ 75sqm/807sqft 3 ‘NG’ (New Generation) 69sqm/743sqft (2 toilets, master bedroom with attached bathroom) 3 ‘I’ (Modified) 70sqm/750sqft 3 ‘S’ (Simplified) 65sqm/700sqft 3 ‘I’ (Improved) 60sqm/646sqft (No attached bath, toilet and bath separated, no storeroom) 3 ‘STD’ (Standard) 54sqm/581sqft (No attached bathroom/storeroom. Upgraded units have extra utility room or toilet) 4 bedroom flat Consists of 3 bedrooms, kitchen, living room. 4 ‘A’ 105sqm/1130sqft (2 bathrooms, master bedroom with attached toilet, storeroom) 4 ‘NG’ (New Generation) 92sqm/990sqft 4 ‘S’ (Simplified) 85sqm/914sqft (2 bathrooms, master bedroom with attached toilet, storeroom) 4 ‘I’ (Improved) 83sqm/893sqft (toilet and bath separated, no ...
Read more

Review of Diapers in Singapore (10 brands we’ve bought and tried) Pee-Ka-Poo, Drypers, Huggies, Amico, MamyPoko, Merries, Pampers, Offspring, Bambo Nature, Moony

Image
  Pampers Premium Care Tapes Newborn (0-5kg) $27.90 for 70 pieces Bambo Nature Baby Diaper Size 1 (2-5kg) $16.10 for 28 pieces Offspring Ultra-Thin Newborn Diapers (0-4kg) $12.50 for 22 pieces Fashion Diapers S Size (3-6kg) $19.90 for 48 pieces MamyPoko Air Fit Tape Diaper New Born (0-5kg) $25.95 for 90 pieces Air Fit Tape Diaper S (4-8kg) $25.95 for 84 pieces Moony Tape Diapers Newborn (0-5kg) $26.95 for 90 pieces Tape Diapers S (4-8kg) $26.95 for 84 pieces Amico Tape Diapers NB96 x 2 packs (0-5kg) $45.90 for 192 pieces Tape Diapers S88 x 2 packs (4-8kg) $45.90 for 176 pieces Tape Diapers M68 x 2 packs (6-11kg) $45.90 for 136 pieces Tape Diapers L58 x 2 packs (9-14kg) $45.90 for 116 pieces Huggies Platinum Justborn Diapers (0-3.5kg) $11.40 for 24 pieces Platinum Diapers New Born (0-5kg) $11.40 for 30 pieces Platinum Diapers S (4-8kg) $22.95 for 82 pieces Platinum Diapers M (6-11kg) $22.95 for 64 pieces Platinum Diapers L (9-14kg) $22.95 for 54 pieces Platinum Nature Made Diapers -...
Read more

PAP & LKY supporters FAN REN RAY & Bryannz FAN RUICHENG from Cuffz Holdings are cheaters who scammed money using "GLOBAL BUSINESS CLUB PTE. LTD."

Image
In 2010, I collected evidence to expose private education issues.When I gave the information to both the mainstream and... Posted by Han Hui Hui 韩慧慧 on  Friday, July 17, 2015 They are brothers staying at 345 Bukit Batok Street 34 #06-276 Singapore (650345) Police report was being lodged but no action was being taken. It’s not few tens or hundreds of dollars but thousands of dollars from a single person, imagine how many Singaporeans out there are being scammed by this pair of devious brothers? As usual, I was curious why aren’t the police taking any action and upholding justice to return people their hard earned money, so I did a background search. Anyway, this pair of brothers blocked me on facebook after I confronted them on behalf of my friend =.= FAN RUICHENG S8307560J https://www.facebook.com/bryannzfan FAN REN RAY S8025476H https://www.facebook.com/DatoSriRayFan People are questioning why are the police not doing anything and who can the...
Read more

Alvin & Yuki wedding got cancelled 2months before it happens and Zoe Raymond locked her blog.

Image
It’s the season of giving! A year ago, I told you about http://huihui247.blogspot.com/2011/12/ghost-protocol.html This is my third official year, hence there’ll be 300 beneficiaries. It will be 60 per organisation :) It’s great that the number of people have reduced as they have moved on to a better life =) In the social media of Singapore, there’s this saga: Apparently, this couple is gonna get married. And here comes this third party. Sounds like the pink lipstick that I recently talked about. Every day, people go on fb and comment, the comments are very interesting… Now I think I went on to read the comments rather that what the people actually said. So I saw this comment That she locked her blog, I went and it’s true. Well, he’s earning 8k a month which will allow her to lead a tai-tai life according to people who commented as well, which is the kinda life she wants so she can just sit back, relax and not bother. Now that’s sad, because my entertainment ...
Read more

#YearningForJustice : A mother's musings to her future child

Singaporean Han Hui Hui started blogging in 2007. Within a decade, blogging leads her to vlogging, making YouTube videos, meeting people in public, being part of public gatherings, interrogated by the Singapore police, charged in court by the Attorney-General's Chambers, fined by the authority, imprisoned by the establishment, deported by the Malaysian immigration back to Singapore under the demand of the Singapore government in 2017... To grow from a secondary school student in 2007 under the public eye, to have social media platforms being scrutinised by the people, to the extent of having public funds being used to pay the Attorney-General's Chambers so that they can type transcripts of Hui Hui's videos in order to coerce her via an unwritten law - a jail sentence of 18 years and a fine of SGD$600,000 in 2017 is something no one has, and hopefully no one will have to experience. In 2018, the gratitude to be nominated by the International Federation for Human Ri...
Read more

The Exodus of Singaporean Lawyers and the label from "The Leader of The Protests" to "The Leader of The Unvaccinated" in Singapore

Image
In Singapore, the government Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) is busy persecuting lawyers who speak up, or merely raised questions about the incumbent ruling party. On 23 March 2023, lawyer Charles Yeo Yao Hui, who has a warrant of arrest issued against him after he absconded, intended to go to the UK to seek political asylum. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/fugitive-lawyer-charles-yeo-told-investigator-that-he-does-not-intend-to-return-to-singapore On 21 March 2023, lawyer M. Ravi has been handed the maximum suspension of five years for making “baseless and grave” allegations against the Attorney-General, prosecutors and the Law Society that undermine the integrity of Singapore’s justice system. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/lawyer-m-ravi-suspended-for-5-years-over-baseless-allegations-against-justice-system On 3 March 2023, the police have opened investigations into Mr Lee Hsien Yang and his wife Lee Suet Fern for potential offences of g...
Read more

CHILD ABUSE in Singapore shot up 459% despite signing UNCRC

Image
Singapore Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) revealed that the number of investigations into child abuse cases shot up 459% from 383 in 2012 to 2,141 in 2021 despite signing United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/number-of-child-abuse-cases-investigated-remained-high-in-2022-msf According to the government propaganda, the increase in the number of child abuse cases is because "the Children and Young Persons Act amendment came into effect in July 2020, so those who are 16 and older but under 18 will now be part of the statistics on child abuse" Is the government trying to say that child abuse cases for children below the age of 16 did not increase as most of the abuses are against children between the age of 16 and 18? Or is the government trying to cover up the main cause of abuse which is stress of the abusers due to high cost of living that resulted in the vicious cycle of child abuse...
Read more

My response to the Singapore government Ministry of Home Affairs' statement against me.

MHA: First, Ms Han was not subjected to a strip search as she had claimed. She was searched by a female officer and had remained clothed for the entire duration. Second, her allegation that male officers had walked past while she was being searched is untrue. Ms Han was based in the women's wing of the lock-up, which is not accessible to male officers. A privacy screen is also deployed when a search is in progress. What I posted on my blog: “Even socks were taken away from us and we were made to sit on the cold concrete floor.” “There was supposed to be screen used but they simply put it there for show rather than really using it.” (Note: The MHA statement only said "State Court" - I was "body searched" in both the High Court and the State Court). MHA: Third, the allegation that Malaysian APOs (hired by SPS) had made disparaging comments against Singaporeans is unfounded. In addition, the team overseeing the lock-up consists of Prisons officers suppor...
Read more

Alone in cell.

Image
On 27 Jun 2016, Singapore’s state court Judge CHAY YUEN FATT made judgement against me as follows: 1. SGD$2,500 fine because “She rallied her Facebook readers”. 2. SGD$600 fine because I “made vitriolic speeches to denounce the government and various government policies”. On 22 Feb 2017, Singapore’s high court Justice SEE KEE OON rejected my appeal and I was immediately being sent to face 5 weeks in prison for not paying the fine of $3,100. On 22 Feb 2017 at 10am, I was at Singapore’s High Court for the appeal against the judgement made by Singapore’s state court Judge CHAY YUEN FATT. Together with me were two elderly co-accused Ivan Koh (age 62) and Janet Low (age 57). During the appeal hearing, I asked if it was correct to amend the charge sheet just a day before the trial? Our trial was on 13 Oct 2015, but the charge sheet was amended on 12 Oct 2015. It was not acknowledged by us and was not brought to our attention. We only noticed that after we’ve filed our appeal, ...
Read more

Singapore’s judiciary system | “KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT” shouted DPP Francis NG Yong Kiat. Judge kept silent. Judge did nothing.

Image
“KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT” shouted (to Han Hui Hui) Senior Director, Senior State Counsel DPP Francis NG Yong Kiat. Judge kept silent. Judge did nothing. Singapore’s AGC DPP can shout and intimidate Singaporeans, and behave in such an unbecoming manner in court when they do not have any legal representation. If this can happen in broad daylight in court, what do you think happens during police interrogations behind “closed door”? Singapore police used 8 hours to interrogate me and 6 hours for my co-accused, without any lunch or dinner. Can you imagine what 14-year-old Benjamin Lim went through in his 3-hour “interview” at the police station? Is Singapore a first world country? Han Hui Hui: Who did you ask to shout? Ariffin Iskandar Sha Bin Ali Akbar: Roy. Han Hui Hui: Why did you ask Roy to... Posted by Han Hui Hui 韩慧慧 on  Monday, 11 January 2016 Han Hui Hui: Did any of the elderly steps forward and tell you to stop the protest? Judge: *rejected* Han Hui Hui:......
Read more